<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>System 13 &#187; socialnetworking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://system13.org/tag/socialnetworking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://system13.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 03:11:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Social networking sites &#8211; what&#8217;s the big deal?</title>
		<link>http://system13.org/2007/07/11/social-networking-sites-whats-the-big-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://system13.org/2007/07/11/social-networking-sites-whats-the-big-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Entries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socialnetworking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://system13.org/2007/07/11/social-networking-sites-whats-the-big-deal/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been watching the hype over social networking sites this year (and before, in fact), and I must say: I don&#8217;t get it. The social networking sites don&#8217;t do anything for me. For a while I had a MySpace page, &#8230; <a href="http://system13.org/2007/07/11/social-networking-sites-whats-the-big-deal/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been watching the hype over social networking sites this year (and before, in fact), and I must say: I don&#8217;t get it. The social networking sites don&#8217;t do anything for me. For a while I had a MySpace page, which I admittedly neglected; I have since deleted my account there. I now have a Facebook page, which I rarely look at; I have a Twitter account, which I&#8217;ve not used for about a month; a friend (hi, Nils) recently offered me an invitation to Pownce, which I politely turned down. Why? More of the same &#8211; and that doesn&#8217;t amount to much.</p>
<p>Perhaps I&#8217;m being pessimistic; perhaps I&#8217;m being an old &#8220;stick in the mud.&#8221; But the idea of, for lack of a better word, <em>collecting</em> friends on these sites doesn&#8217;t appeal to me. It&#8217;s almost as if friendships <em>aren&#8217;t</em> the key point; the key point is to <em>collect</em> friends, to increase your number of contacts. Have you known this person your whole life? Add them as a friend. Have you talked to this person a few times at work? Add &#8216;em as a friend. Did you bump into this person while walking to the store four months ago, and you&#8217;ve not seen them since? Add them as a friend!</p>
<p>All of the social networking sites I&#8217;ve used have had a similar quality to them, and that quality, I think, is <em>hollowness</em>. There&#8217;s lots of flash &#8211; everyone has their little mood indicators, their 16&#215;16 avatars, their favorite song listed. But am I really coming to <em>know</em> these people through all of that crap? I don&#8217;t really think so; or rather, I could come to know them a lot better through another medium, say, <em>email</em>. With email, people can send me messages, and I can send them messages; the difference here is that when I send them an email, they don&#8217;t get an email saying that I sent them an email, requesting them to go to a different website to login to <em>read</em> my email. The email is just there. And, if you don&#8217;t know what I&#8217;m alluding to, sign up at Facebook or MySpace, and have someone send you a message. You have to go through that nonsense <em>every single time</em>. This can become exceedingly irritating when you and another person are sending fairly short messages back and forth to each other. It&#8217;s always nice to spend a few minutes going to another site, logging in, clicking on Inbox, just to read &#8220;haha, yeah&#8221; or something similar.</p>
<p>To be fair, Twitter was fun for a while; for a few days, I was twittering (tweeting?) like mad, and so were all of my contacts / friends. But then I came to see Twitter as just another timesink. Sure, it could be fun, but if I really wanted to <em>communicate</em> with my friends, I think I&#8217;d be better off hitting them up on an IM or through email. No middle-men websites required. Especially middle-men that dictate 140 characters or less.</p>
<p>But, like I said, maybe it&#8217;s just me. Clearly, the sites have something going for them, otherwise they wouldn&#8217;t be such smash hits. But I personally don&#8217;t enjoy them. I don&#8217;t find them filling. Real friendships, real communication, real discussion &#8211; these things are like a full mean, with steak, baked potato, some broccoli and carrots, and a bit of dessert. Twitter, MySpace, Facebook &#8211; popcorn. Tastes alright, but is certainly not filling at all.</p>
<p>By the way, a hat tip to <a href="http://nodependenciesnologo.wordpress.com/" title="Nils">Nils</a>, who wrote <a href="http://nodependenciesnologo.wordpress.com/2007/07/05/yeah-yeah-the-blogs-dead-now-talk-to-me/" title="this post">this post</a>, which is what got me thinking about this topic. His post is quite good, so go read it. Go on. Get outta&#8217; here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://system13.org/2007/07/11/social-networking-sites-whats-the-big-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

