I was cleaning and reorganizing a bit in our bedroom this past weekend, and saw that the Prisoner of Azkaban movie was on. Having seen only bits and pieces of it previously, and having just finished the book, I thought I’d tune in. I ended up catching the last hour or so. I had a few thoughts on it:
- The Dementors looked eerily similar (eery pun intended) to the Ringwraiths from the Lord of the Rings films. They were a bit more wispy, whereas the Ringwraiths were definitely solid beings, but still - the similarities are quite strong. Not to say that Rowling copied the Ringwraiths, however; tall, thin, black hooded creatures seem to be a pretty common thing in the fantasy world. Ringwraiths, Dementors - hell, look at most depictions of the Grim Reaper.
- I thought the werewolf form of Lupin was somehow off. Its hair wasn’t shabby enough or something. It looked too humanoid and not wolfish enough. Then again, I’ve always been one who prefers his werewolves to be men that turn into just an overly large wolf, not some humanoid looking thing.
- I wasn’t very fond of Gary Oldman’s portrayal of Sirius. He seemed too frantic, too nervous. When reading the book, I pictured him as quite smooth and relaxed, sure of himself. Oldman’s version acted a bit like he was going to explode at any moment. Perhaps I perceived this incorrectly though; I was, after all, trying to maintain some bit of cleaning momentum while watching.
- As noted, I only caught the last hour, so perhaps I would have seen the reasoning for the change if I’d seen all of it, but… why did Harry only get the Firebolt broom at the end of the movie? In the book, he got it much, much earlier.
- The Richard Harris Dumbledore from movies 1 and 2 were so much better. I loved the Harris version, and thought Michael Gambon’s version in Azkaban was, for lack of a better word, awful. His speech was off, and he didn’t have the “twinkle” of character that the Harris version had. Harris’ version, while obviously nutty, was funny and enjoyable. Gambon’s version was just weird.
And, worry not, those of you who aren’t fellow Potter fans. I’m halfway through book 4 already. I’d say once I’m done with the series, my Potter mania will pass.
Tags: books, harry potter, Movies

5 comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link
http://system13.org/2007/08/06/a-few-brief-thoughts-about-the-prisoner-of-azkaban-movie/trackback/
August 6, 2007 at 4:24 pm
Cas
I’ll agree with you on the movie version of the wolf Lupin. It was just wrong - too spindly, not woolfy enough.
Sirius being twitchy though?! I think you need to re-read the book on that one. The guy has just got out of Azkaban after a decade. He’s teetering on the brink of sanity most of the time. But he gets better as the movies progress.
As does Gambon and Dumbledore - I will admit, Harris didn’t do it for me as Dumbledore. He was too wishy-washy and didn’t look strong enough to take on a gust of wind, let alone stand up to Voldemort. Gambon brought the right edge to it. You knew Harris’ Dumbledore was good. Gambon brought the ambiguity to the character.
August 6, 2007 at 4:42 pm
Josh
I might dip back into the scenes in the book with Sirius in them. Maybe I misread. I just got a strong impression that, despite the fact he’d been in Azkaban for 12 years, he was fairly calm.
Gah - you like Gambon as Dumbledore? Yuck. I absolutely loved Harris. Gambon comes across to me not as ambiguous, but just weird - as in, hey, old creepy man, please get away from me. He just doesn’t do anything for me at all. Not like I have much choice, though; Harris is dead.
August 7, 2007 at 4:58 pm
Cas
Yes, I am aware that that admission of preference for Gambon has probably struck the death-knell for our friendship, but it’s true!
Not to give anything away, but when you’ve read more of the books, if you can come back to me and say “yes, I can see Harris carrying that off with his breathy whispery voice. He totally brought the evil to the role” then I’ll agree to disagree.
Till that day - Gambon rules!
August 7, 2007 at 6:42 pm
Josh
Well, no, it hasn’t struck the death-knell; it’s just baffled me a bit.
I’ll get back to you when I’ve read further along. Halfway through Goblet of Fire now.
August 8, 2007 at 3:00 am
Joshua J. Slone
To confound you both, having seen the first 3 movies… I barely remember what Dumbledore was like in any. I guess neither made much impression on me.