I wrote back in December about one of my professors and I starting a Buddhist meditation / study group. I wanted to lay down some of my thoughts about the group, and being a “founding member” / leader of it.
First of all, I’d like to say something to everyone who has started groups, led groups, etc.: you have my respect! You had quite a bit of it before, but you have even more now that I’ve tried it myself. Starting and helping lead a group is much more difficult than I ever imagined.
I had envisioned our Buddhist group meeting regularly, with an agenda - what we would discuss, what resources we would use, etc. I also envisioned regular meditation meetings.
The latter has worked out fairly well. While we don’t meet as often as some of us would like, due to variety of schedules, we were meeting about once a week, up until the end of last quarter, at which point things kind of fell to hell. (I’m trying to rectify this problem now, by the way.) Our meditation sessions would usually last about an hour, and we would mix sitting and walking meditation.
I posed the question back in December, “What’s it like to meditate with other people?” I can now answer this question. The experience is different from meditating alone. Despite the fact that all participants are sitting, mostly not moving, and being silent, one is quite aware of your fellowmeditators . Before we started meditating, I was curious as to whether or not the other people would be a distraction. On the contrary, they actually help me focus on my meditation. Why? Because I know if I stray, if I shift and fidget, or even if I just get tense, others will know, and their meditation will be affected. It’s also reassuring to have others sitting, not “doing” anything, etc. I’d love to say that I always feel like I’m doing the “right thing” when meditating at home, but I’d be lying. I think everymeditator runs into the question of, “Just what the hell am I doing, sitting here like this, counting my breaths?” When all is said and done, I enjoy our group meditation sessions a great deal; they’ve not helped me solidify my at-home practice much, but that’s not the group’s fault - it’s mine!
The other aspect of the group, which I’d hoped would grow and flourish - that of studying Buddhist thought, doctrines, etc. - hasn’t gone so well. It is certainly not a matter of outright disagreement. Our group is rather small - there are four or five “regulars”, including myself - and we all get along splendidly. The problem is instead a lack of consensus, a lack of someone going, “Okay, this is what we’re doing.” In other words, the leadership is lacking - or perhaps, one could say that the leadership is just as confused and lost as the other members of the group!
The other members of the group often look to me and my professor for guidance, because we’re the ones who started the group. But honestly, I am personally not very good at that position! Why? Because I want to please everyone. (I believe my professor suffers from this as well.) For example, we talked about studying one school of Buddhism, and then moving on to others later. Some of us wanted to study Tibetan Buddhism; others wanted to take a look into Zen Buddhism. Who should make the call on what we go for? Luckily, no “executive decisions” had to be made, because we all agreed to study Zen Buddhism. But then what? Are we just going to meet and discuss Zen Buddhism? Study a particular book? Alter our meditation practice? What aspects of Zen Buddhism are we studying? We didn’t know; we had an idea of what we wanted to do, but we didn’t know what move to make next. We knew where we wanted to go, but weren’t entirely sure about the directions on how to get there.
It would be ideal if the group as a whole could simply decide on the next move, but it’s unfortunately not that simple. Buddhist or not, we’re all individuals, and we all have different takes on things. Some of us will want to use this book; others won’t want to use any book at all; others will still have an underlying desire to look into something totally different. What does all of this lead to? Inaction. I think that since we’re all a bit confused about how to move forward, we just don’t move forward. I’m certainly not saying that I dislike our meditation meetings, or find them useless - on the contrary, as I mentioned above, I find them helpful, and I enjoy the companionship. But our study sessions, when we’re supposed to be meeting, to discuss and learn about Buddhism and our practices - these sessions have sort of been dead in the water from the get go. And for that, I feel I need to take my fair share of the blame. I don’t think I (or my professor) foresaw the problems we’d run into, and we certainly didn’t plan accordingly.
I’m not sure what to do now. Perhaps we need to have a meeting specifically to talk about where we’d all like the group to go, what we’d like to do, and how we’d like to do it. Perhaps someone - me, my professor, anyone in the group - needs to grab the reigns and say, “Alright, everyone, here’s where we’re going, and this is how we’re getting there.” I’m especially hesitant about this, though, because I don’t “own” the group; no one does. Without the members, the group wouldn’t exist. For this reason, I hate to come across as dictatorial. Perhaps I need to email a Cybermonk and ask for his guidance.
In short, the experiences with this group have taught me that it’s one thing to say, “let’s start a group to do X”, and quite another to start that group and actively lead the group to growing, flourishing, expanding. Even if all of the members like each other, get along, have similar (but not identical!) ideas about how the group should work - even if all of these factors come together (which, in our case, they have) - it’s still not easy to steer the ship out of the harbor, and head off to where you want to go. It’s quite likely that you’ll have your crew on board, with everyone scratching their heads, saying, “Um, what do we do now?”
If you’ve been in a similar situation before (or not), I’d love your comments, and any ideas you might have that would help me jump-start our group’s activity. Thanks!
Tags: buddhism, groups, leadership, personal

5 comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link
http://system13.org/2007/06/27/some-reflections-on-starting-a-buddhist-study-and-meditation-group/trackback/
June 27, 2007 at 2:48 pm
Tom
While I’m not the leader of anything as interesting as a Buddhist study group I have noticed a few things. Being a quiet and reserved individual myself I was amazed at what group mentality can do.
Once you start talking and directing, people will naturally follow. As long as you don’t overstep those hard-line bounds and you keep people entertained and learning there is much they will do without complaint.
You’re the leader, people expect you to lead. They didn’t come to the group expecting that everything will go their way. Don’t be afraid to use that. When the time comes for you to step down someone else will take over and the group will follow that person. Following is easier than leading, so step up and lead and people will follow.
June 28, 2007 at 3:22 am
Tracy
The group that I meditate and have discussion with was started in a similar way to your group, although I was not there from the start. I thought that I might tell you a little bit about the format of our meetings. The meditation group was started and is facilitated by a University professor and his sister on the campus of the local university (although it’s open to all, not just students). We meditate for an hour (a mix of sitting and walking meditation), and then have a cup of tea and discussion for another hour. The subject of discussion can be suggested by any of the community of meditators in advance to our “facilitator”, or he just chooses something that comes up during the week in his life, and lets us know what subject he has chosen by email a few days before the meeting so that we can give the issue some thought. Very often, once we are discussing something, another subject that someone wants to discuss will come up, and so can be set as the discussion for next week. We tend to discuss practical Buddhism, that is, Buddhism in everyday life, rather than studying Sutras etc.
June 28, 2007 at 8:13 am
Taisen
Hi - I might have something that you’d find interesting: some of the more long-standing members of our local group - the Liverpool Zen Group - put together a guide called “How to set up a Zen sitting group”. You can find it on our website at http://www.liverpool-zen.org.uk/resources/setting-up.pdf. Hope this is of some use.
Don’t know what to say about a study group - it’s something that I’d love to set up for our own group but it requires time and commitment that I just can’t give at the moment - and the core of our group is sitting zen practice. It always requires someone (usually just one person) to take the lead on these things. Hopefully then other people can be encouraged to get involved and so avoid anything too autocratic!
I joined our group at a time when it was starting to expand quite rapidly, and I think that a large part of the reason it grew was that it moved out of someone’s living room and into a fairly large space in the middle of the city that was rented for regular Wednesday evening sessions. There was a definite ‘critical mass’ that was reached when we had about 10 people coming to sit each week (not necessarily the same 10)… it went up to 25-30 pretty quickly after that!
June 28, 2007 at 3:44 pm
Bill Webb
As odd as it may sound, go to http://www.aa.org/en_services_for_members.cfm?PageID=100
and download this file.
AA has nearly 80 years of experience of running organizations with no bosses, and you’ll find all sorts of useful tips.
Good luck.
bw
June 29, 2007 at 4:56 pm
Josh
Tom: Thanks for the advice. I’ll keep it in mind.
I guess one problem is that I haven’t, even from the start, seen myself as one of the “leaders.” One of the guys who wanted to start the group? Sure. But leader? No.
Tracy: Thank you for the insight into your meditation group! I don’t think I or my professor have made it clear that suggestions from other group members are always welcome. Perhaps I should throw that out, to let them know that if there’s something they want to discuss, to just let us know and we’ll do so.
Taisen: First of all, thanks for the link to the PDF guide. I’ve not read it in full yet, but after taking a quick glance, I think it will be very helfpul.
We actually aren’t meeting in anyone’s living room; we’ve been meeting in local library conference rooms. Just this past week, one of our members became the general manager at a hotel, so we now have access to the hotel’s meeting room whenever we want, as long as customers aren’t using it. I’ve not been to the room yet, but I’m sure it’s nice (not that you need an exquisite room to sit in meditation!)
Bill: Thanks for the idea, I hadn’t thought of that at all. I’ll poke around on their website and see what I can glean from it.