I mentioned yesterday that this week was finals week for me. Well, finals are now over, so I can take a breather. I’ve got a few weeks before I start back at the university for fall quarter.
One of the classes I took was about the history of America, from 1828 to 1900. I found it to be an extremely interesting class. I had had the professor in question before, when I took his class which covered from the founding of America to 1828. The same ‘interestingness’ that thrived in his first class was also in his second.
Basically, what I find so interesting about his courses, is that he gives a true picture of the history – not a patriotic version. Throughout my public school ‘career,’ I was given the patriotic version. All of the good guys were drummed up, and all of the horrible events throughout American history were kind of swept under the proverbial rug.
I recall from middle school that the settlement of the Trans-Mississippi West was essentially, “American settlers went out west for gold. They helped Indians onto reservations so that the Indian culture would be preserved.”
Now, certainly, I don’t expect a middle school class to cover nearly the amount of detail that a university course does. However, the version I was given wasn’t just less detailed. It was totally wrong. Killing off millions of buffalo (60 million between 1870 and 1900) to help bring about the demise of the Native Americans was not ‘helping them.’ Forcing Native American children into schools ran by the Bureau of Indian Affairs, where they were forced to dress like Americans and to speak English, was not helping them. Setting up treaties and annuity payments with different tribes, only to turn around and break the treaties when American railroad companies and gold prospertors wanted in, was not helping them.
I think it’s interesting to note that, at least in classes I had in public school, the Native American question was mostly glossed over. However, reams of content was devoted to slavery. Is this because African Americans make up a sizeable portion of the American population now, and Native Americans don’t?
I don’t really get why the public school system teaches this extremely altered, patriotic version (unless they’re just going for patriotism points with the kids). Every country has their bad spots in history. I just think it’d be better if the bad spots were taught along with the good spots. Kind of like how Germany now forces Nazi Germany history into their kids’ heads. It’s a decent way to insure that the atrocities don’t happen again.
Then again, if Nazi Germany had won the war, I wonder – what would their public school system be teaching?
Technorati Tags: indians, nativeamericans, imperialism
Comments 6
About Native American vs slavery, yeah, what you suggest is probably one reason. Having done no research on this question at all, though, let me posit another: the “happy ending”.
It’s easy to say “Well, slavery was shitty, but then people stopped being owned by other people.” However, “Well, genocide and culture destruction was shitty, but… now some of the descendants of the survivors have casinos?” is still a pretty shitty turnout.
It sounds, though, like you got a more whitewashed version of high school history than I did, though. Certainly I don’t remember going over it in great detail, but hearing “They helped Indians onto reservations so that the Indian culture would be preserved.” sounds totally nuts.
Posted 25 Aug 2006 at 10:21 am ¶Well, keep in mind, I said middle school, not high school. I left the public school system halfway through my tenth grade, and I hadn’t taken any real history courses in high school at that point.
But, even for middle school, the history we were given was still just totally wrong.
Posted 25 Aug 2006 at 10:41 am ¶You don’t have to wonder, what the Nazis would be teaching – at least for some parts of history. Just reed the speeches of Hitler, Goebbels, Himmler et al. They all drew a really weird picture of history in their speeches to justify their terrible plans.
But…your history lesson in middle school reminds of a plan Himmler had for the youth of the eastern european countries: “The aim of the schools has to be: simple mathematics up to 500, writing the name, apprenticeship, as a divine order to obey the germans, being honest, hard-working and good. I don’t think reading is necessary.”
Himmler’s plan was to let the people of these countries die out by these measures. Might the US-government have similar plans with its own citizens?
Sorry. Bad joke.
Posted 25 Aug 2006 at 11:28 am ¶Nah, not really (in regards to it being a bad joke). It really is something that concerns me. Being taught ‘dumbed down’ lessons in school due to maturity or time restrictions, I get. Totally changing the material to make our country seem ‘better’ irks the hell out of me.
Posted 25 Aug 2006 at 3:28 pm ¶i really like yoru blog!
Posted 26 Aug 2006 at 7:22 pm ¶its so cool!
Thanks Tekoda.
Posted 26 Aug 2006 at 9:15 pm ¶Post a Comment